Pushing the reputations points with cheap renderings for gallery images

Discussion started by 3dgtx

Hey vendors,
today I´ve checked up some sellers, who indeed manipulate their reputation points on CGT with cheap gallery entries.
I don´t mind, they can do what ever they want and are allowed to do by CGT.

However, fact is, most of those "renderings" are ultra-low quality. Indeed on a scale from low quality to high = 0-10,
on a level like 1-3? let´s be honest more likely like on a 2 on long term.

Do you feel it is fair what they´re doing?

I mean, all of us could upload probably 100000000000000 such "renderings" onto CGT within 1 week right?
Won´t we try !?

Oh wait, my reputation points were earned honestly. I did not upload such cheap renderings to my account.
But to be honest, I have like 240 TB! over 5+ quality renderings on HD´s, should I upload it and end up on 80%
revenues right now?

You decide.

Answers

Posted 12 months ago
1

Gallery needs more high-quality renders. Yes gallery has long been used as a sandbox or image hosting for spam and other trash.
We are fighting as possible with this despite the fact that it is quite often difficult, since search in the gallery also has certain features and bugs.

3dgtxOLD wrote
"Yes gallery has long been used as a sandbox or image hosting for spam and other trash" You name it. I discovered it today and it is M.A.S.S.I.V.E. If you want Jaguar, after I´ve slept, I upload enough content after then (my own renderings per Vray, Final Render, Brazil, etc. and whatsever) that covers immedtiately my desired 80%. But in meanwhile (I hope at least) you know it + ME better. Hence, yes, fight against it, because it is the right fight. Unfair to ALL other vendors that focus on contents.
3dgtx wrote
3dgtx
Ok, read below
Posted 12 months ago
4

Allright, seems that everyone (also those who´ve not started yet...) have this potential.
I am able to to turn my till now hard fought 76% into 80%. If you need me to prove it.. I will. Just with massive gallery entries.

3dgtx wrote
3dgtx
Haha, but do you mean it seriously? I mean, hundreds of renderings.. just for dick comparison? And what "Greta" will think about? I´ll stand my MAN if you want anyway. What ever Dalia Lasaite thinks about.
jaguarbeastproduction wrote
jaguarbeastproduction
If these are not hundreds of renders of the same model then why not. And sorry, but I didn't understand anything about Greta, starting with why her name is in quotes.
3dgtx wrote
3dgtx
I did not mean to offend you with quotes. Quotes are bad! very bad. bad bad bad. Bad quotes.
3dgtx wrote
3dgtx
Please, please jaguar, you already have proven that you hate quotes very much.
Posted 12 months ago
3

And no, of course not hundreds of renders of the same model.
I am NOT AI! And I am not producing stuff for NFT scammers.

Posted 12 months ago
1

It's only 5 points per upload. I tried it out now. Which is as much as you get for a postitive review, something that is infinitely harder to get than uploading a single image ot the gallery.

3dgtx wrote
3dgtx
exactly, uploading images is fastly done, getting a positve review is like a bloody fight
Posted 12 months ago
4

@jaguar - "since search in the gallery also has certain features and bugs." - And why it has still bugs? is this gallery "feature" that brand-new and still such a challenge to master for you developers over there? Also 5 points for a cheap rendering - and many are just cheap screenies! - in relation to as VityaBVityaB wrote (see below) the 5 points for getting a positive review of a purchased product is outrageous unfair.

SoccerModels wrote
SoccerModels
That´s indeed very unfair and the discrepancy remarkable. One should flood this place with gallery images, otherwise as it seems this lection won´t be learned by Trader, to tough to learn the easy way.
3dgtx wrote
3dgtx
"to tough to learn the easy way", right. I doubt they listen to whoever besides of their investors or their master of desaster, who or what ever it is. Maybe AI? not so absurd. I bet they listen to speculations and forecasts of an AI program - that´s their master of desaster. Many vendors are longer in the 3d world as they themself and many are engaging by sharing good observations and have essential - completely basic - advices, if something is truly and totally odd. But CGt knows it all better as it seems. Man, why I am even here on that train.
Posted 12 months ago
1

if someone upload low quality renders on their gallery, it's their own loss i guess, gallery should be a tool to attract client

3dgtx wrote
3dgtx
Basically yes, but many don´t care. They just upload quantity and many of them earn more as more talented vendors assuming quickly reached 80% versus 70% on the long run. That´s a No No.

Your answer

In order to post an answer, you need to sign in.

Help
Chat