Is this what Cgtraders want ? I think it is inevitable, Sooner or later it was bound to happen. I am still possitive that AI tool will helps Real artists in many ways like making the workflow faster. But Turning 2D to 3D is worrisome. but Not at the moment. it is not strong or capable enough. But i am not sure about the future. And seeing this platform slowly turning into AI theme platform is a bit of disappointment
This is the future, and we can't stop it, we just have to learn how to use it to further our goals.
the one-off payment is fine now to launch the platform and let it try... it cannot be the purchasing model for the future if they sell it for a few $ a month.... in fact there is the Ts AI out there which with the prompt really create 3d models.... inevitably the artists' payment will be based on the number of uses and less on the value of the 3d model if they want to stay within the costs.... I think it will go like this..
Ts has also abandoned certified models and opened up his stemcell method of the future to everyone.... it will be a good battle between the two...3D AI market...
There are already similar discussions on the forum about gctrader's AI.
However, if cgratder doesn't do it, the other platforms, both independent AI and 3D Model marketplaces, already do it... nice?? I would not know...
Of course, Cgtrader's approach is more in favor of 3D artists because it asks artists to sell their models for AI.
Turbosquid's counterpart instead trained its AI without giving any compensation to the artists of their platform.
Cgtrader's mistake was to not indicate things clearly... the artists still haven't fully understood how much they can earn from the sale... whether their model will be used by everyone or by the single buyer who buys it and then uses it in the AI.... or if there will be future piecework compensation for the use of the model.... too much confusion and obviously the confusion only generates alarmism
best regards... Mak21
In order to post an answer, you need to sign in.
