New Turbosquit regulations aiming to undermine fair competition

Discussion started by iterateCGI

Turbosquid is now enrolling new regulations involving restricting freedom to set own prices for own work (see image attached).
(https://imgur.com/42jq4qt)

(!!jet again restrictions!!)

In doing so Ts aims to ensure maintaining 60% earnings on artists work while not get hurt from competition that can deliver similar or better services for a fraction of that cost, they probably also hope to make going exclusive with them a bit more attractive in this way.

I received this email just few minutes ago (see image).
(https://imgur.com/6ZnJSHt)

So basically now we are not even allowed to charge the hefty cost of the service on top of own work, Ts thus asks for artists to actually cut in own work in order to deliver them the 60% cut painlessly.

Its probably time now to stand firmly and say no to this, which is (I see no other option) what I’m gonna do and probably get deleted account by doing so.

At same time this is also good news for artists and healthy future of the market, now is probably best time to only invest in the best platforms and build good reputation on them because the future for 3D content is going to get very exciting.

Ts openly admits now that clients see the higher prices (due to hefty royalty on artist) as a problem and they linger in stay loyal to the Ts platform.

The way this is probably going to work out now is that Ts is going to be left with only exclusives and less and less non exclusives, then it probably going to get hard times ahead for the exclusives on there, or maybe not, hoe knows?

Anyways, my bet is on innovative and cost effective services.

I’m going to mail them back and say “leave my price settings as they are or delete my account if you feel the need to do so”.

To 3D stock media customers I would say, keep looking on other places to compare prices, that is your very own good right.

Answers

Posted almost 7 years ago
3

Yes i received e-mail too.
And at this moment i don't know what to do, but i think i will remove my models.
If my models with same price will be on TS, that will decrease sales on CGT. And i don't want sell my models with average 30% royalties, then there no use of selling models.

iterateCGI wrote
iterateCGI
Absolutely right, that's why I basically leave the choice to them in whether or not they still want to sell my work. If its up to me they still may, but I'm not going to cut down, that's for sure. And yes no worry’s market is growing rapidly with opportunity for sellers all over the place.
AtomStudios wrote
AtomStudios
I think the same, also will delete my models from TS
Posted almost 7 years ago
1

TS is the largest conglomerate in this space and aggressively pushes higher prices with arrogance... they've bought out other companies selling models and somehow believe they're untouchable, I got quite a negative response from the TS community!

Their community actually gave me some heavy criticism for sharing a few free models, cloaked as "advice. While I appreciate intelligent & constructive debate, their approach was insulting and I reacted appropriately. Ultimately their Vice President of Business Development(Beau Pershall) stepped in, reprimanded the conversation and ultimately closed down the forum thread. I also received an email with a warning, yet friendly.

My responses were in equal opinion to you @iterateCGI and I told Beau to block my account if they weren't happy with my opinion, but that they would be committing an offence according to their guidelines.

A lot more went down in that conversation that I haven't covered here and I will be posting screengrabs on the entire discussion (including my TS inbox) conversation on Reddit.

To be clear, I stand my ground regardless and my only crime was wanting to give things away to the community for free, I of course also have models for a price, but seeing as I own a 3D studio in two streams of revenue, I dont charge much for any my models as they are all created in our studio for existing clients and we don't need to rely on selling models for a large profit, in no way is this done to undermine other content creators.

My conclusion: Content creators on here benefit from the money made and ultimately it should be up to the individual and not the website to chose a price.

Cassini wrote
Cassini
Not to mention how much of a pain it is to upload models on TS! Every other website is easier!
Posted almost 7 years ago
2

It's hilarious how arrogant, incompetent and stupid these guys at TS are. They just shoot themselves in the foot. If they didn't deserve it I would feel sorry for them.

Hey CGT team! It would be shame to not use this great opportunity that TS gave you.
For example how about a "CGT exclusive seller" badge or something like this. Or some tiny icon on a product thumbnail.

iterateCGI wrote
iterateCGI
Ow no pleas nothing of that here, just do well and automatically have good position and good sales. With do well I mean make nice stuff, diversify, do not make more of the same and drive prices to the bottom for yourself and others.
IndieArt wrote
IndieArt
I don't know how would a simple icon changed anything but whatever. I will just write it in my description, lets see if I ruin this marketplace.
Posted almost 7 years ago
0

Turbosquid aim ONLY on CGtrader, I received the email too,
my colleagues too. There is a blackmail, chantage.
I need to raise a prices here, make them equal with Turbosquid. Otherwise, they will reduce my prices to CGT prices. Sorry, my dear customers. But I dont want to lose my money there.

But I think there is a solution: CGtrader must do the sales permanently: weekend sale, weekstart sale, midweek sale, daysale and nightsale, breakfast sale and dinner sale :) Formally the price will be the same as on TS, but the real price for buyer will be cheaper here.

(To be an exclusive seller is not profitable. It is better to sale on several stocks instead of +20% on one market)

Yehat wrote
Yehat
Ребят, если здесь есть русские, присоединяйтесь к обсуждению.
LemonadeCG wrote
LemonadeCG
Making permanent discounts would be worst thing cgtrader could do. Aren't you sick enough of that neverending price war? Not CGT nor TS will be the real loosers of that war, but we, artists, will. Everytime they make global price reduction, introduce discounts, sales, price regulation, we do nothing, but conform. I'm sick of that atitude.
tivsol wrote
tivsol
LemonadeCG you're right ... they (TS and CGT) make a profit with our works and are at war with each other ... and we suffer as a result ... sad from this ( TS - begins to bend the stick ... it's possible the prop to close the account with them
tivsol wrote
tivsol
Yehat да что тут обсуждать... похоже придется валить с TS... совсем там люди без души это точно... ( вместо того чтобы поднять роялити с 40% хотябы до 60% (хотябы!) ... они такое делают... слов нет...
iterateCGI wrote
iterateCGI
It’s all about finding the sweet spot and set price exactly to what most are willing to pay for, resulting in best amount of gross. As far as I can tell my prices here where set exactly right at times when sales was slowing down (with discount system), resulting in sales recovery. Keep in mind that computer algorithms are fingering this out using all input data, no human can do that better. The problem with Ts is its high cost, whatever you do on it its not gonna result in more gross when the service is that expensive. In this regard CGt does not need to do anything and still benefit, they already set better things in motion 3 years ago and now getting the benefits of it faster and faster, especially when Ts makes moves like this. What most artists generally need is a good affordable transaction platform providing great tools for uploading, presentation, communication and reputation building, CGt provides that and Ts currently does not (at least not for non exclusives), they are only concerned with own branding, not necessarily that of the artists. As far as I can tell they are moving in direction of only keeping exclusive chekmate content and brand Ts as the quality high valued models provider or something in that direction, maybe that works, maybe not, hoe knows? Its clear they need to differentiate in what they have to offer right now.
renovaco wrote
renovaco
Да конечно хреново поступают с нами, а где же конкуренция-сводный рынок- или там за океаном им насрать на все эти понятия. Мужики я хз.. полный треш, чо делать?!?!?
happymesh wrote
happymesh
Привет! Я не русский. Но нет-нет захаживаю на 3ддд ))))
Posted almost 7 years ago
1

I don't support exclusivity. You can make up to 80% here. With exclusivity, CGT will more likely reduce non exclusives rate, than offer 90% rate for exclusive sellers.

The thing is, the rate here is still higher than the rate for guild members, witch is a great argument for CGT.

There is a simple solution for this, increase the prices here, and also increase you discount rate. The base price will be the same but it will be cheaper here anyway. Also CGT can promote the "Offer your price" feature more. Like display an add in the front page or something. The customer will know that he can get cheaper models here anyway.

Posted almost 7 years ago
2

@hend-z I don't want higher royalties for CGT exclusives. No one is asking for that. But obviously many people will stop selling on TS and customers should know about it. So "CGT exclusive" badge will be enough. Or "You will not find this on TS" badge :D.

And sellers constantly asking/wishing for higher prices for all models everywhere are quite naive. I also want world peace but it's not gonna happen.

Posted almost 7 years ago
2

Got the same letter))). If they do as they wrote I'll suspend my stuff there.

Posted almost 7 years ago
3

I certainly won't agree that TS would regulate my prices. Every model that will face singlehanded price reduction from squiders, will be removed from my shop immediately. I will not conform to their humiliating policy of greediness, even if it means that i will have to remove my entire collection from there. If they will get away with controlling your prices, next step will be even further reduction of your royalty rates or some another form of oppression. Those guys has no soul.

tivsol wrote
tivsol
+1
Cassini wrote
Cassini
Agreed!
Posted almost 7 years ago
5

I understand the Rage, Frustration of the majority, as well as the relief of TS exclusives. But.

NEVER forget: Stock sites are nothing without us, creators. It's not "their" war, it's ours. Even with equal pricing I will continue fighting: I will downscale textures, models & remove file formats on TS, effectively rendering them "light" versions. Next to that, future content will now only be available on CGTrader. I've exited TS sales, and participate in CGT sales.

I only care about fair income and respect. The Platform that delivers this wins. Simple as that. We're little 3D soldiers now, but we can be a hell of an army if we stick together.

So my advice:
- State your objections clearly to TS.
- Negotiate for higher income percentage (no less than 80%)
- Make up your mind where YOU want to go, not the platforms. Choose actions accordingly.

Hope this helps. Do not let anyone plot a course for you, choose your own.

Mark

LemonadeCG wrote
LemonadeCG
I doubt that punishing your customer, just because of middleman's greediness, is a wise move. I'd call that cheating, unless you'd clearly state in the description that you're selling crippled product and full version can be found at other marketplaces. But that's hard to do with squid's censorship.
Polygonal-Miniatures wrote
Polygonal-Miniatures
Of course it will CLEARLY be stated in product description. It is a worthless strategy otherwise.
IndieArt wrote
IndieArt
Are you really going to spent your time making your products worse? :D Looks like you are fighting with yourself to me.
Polygonal-Miniatures wrote
Polygonal-Miniatures
It's an insane amount of work, and therefore I probably will refrain from actually doing it. It is, in the long term, still a valid strategy to get more customers to the platform that pays the highest royalties.
IndieArt wrote
IndieArt
I understand concerns that people will lose costumers if they leave TS but I believe it's not going to happen, especially to sellers like you. I know I'm small unimportant seller but I was in SG, then TS + CGT, then forced to leave TS and became CGT exclusive. In terms of revenue I only gained. Really. I'm making more money selling only on CGT than ever before.
Polygonal-Miniatures wrote
Polygonal-Miniatures
I don't want to leave TS. If CGT gets a monopoly, these practices will just shift. Power corrupts. What matters to me is making the content I love to make and make a decent living of it.
IndieArt wrote
IndieArt
I'm not going to judge you, you have the right to do what you want and what you think is best for you. But if you let someone blackmail you it will never stop and you are giving him the legitimacy to his behavior.
Polygonal-Miniatures wrote
Polygonal-Miniatures
You are so right. Well I know what to do now. Hope I find the courage to actually go through.
iterateCGI wrote
iterateCGI
@mark-florquin, You do not need to fear CGt getting a monopoly, they actually bring real value for artists and do it at low cost possible so that artists do not aspire to go elsewhere, that’s the main strategy of this place, keeping artist happy. Rejecting strategy's for artist to devote exclusively is evidence of this, they let artists free to go somewhere ells if they find something better, they don't fear competition, they really have devotion to deliver the best thing and learn if they fail somehow, Ts is nothing like that.
Posted almost 7 years ago
1

Got the same letter. ((((
trade on TS with 40% roality for the same price as in CGT - this is a profit loss .... I most likely will have to leave TS ...
perhaps they want it ... so that those who are not in the guild left

Polygonal-Miniatures wrote
Polygonal-Miniatures
Don't leave TS. They pay less, make your product less. Downsize texture maps, decimate high poly meshes. Clearly indicate it's a LIGHT product (in title, product description, etc....).
LemonadeCG wrote
LemonadeCG
They told that majority of their revenue (85%+) is comming from exclusive sellers. I guess that means that they largely don't care about us. They just hate to loose traffic to CGT and hoping that by equalising prices, they will gain more customers. What saddens me the most, is that probably they will succeed in that, because despite big shitstorm they're facing now, only few mavericks will leave TS, others will conform and accept lower prices on TS or will rise prices on the other platforms. TS will likely get away unpunished.
tivsol wrote
tivsol
to mark-florquin I would not say that this is such a good idea ... but now this is the only proposal at the moment how to deal with TS I'll think about it ...
iterateCGI wrote
iterateCGI
@lemonadeCG don't forget those exclusives on Ts will feel the competition coming on hard, CGt artists can compete successfully with better prices without hurting themselves here, the clients wont mind, they will see comparingly good stuff and better deals here. If Ts do not clearly diversify in what it has to offer for artist then they will lose this hands dawn, those exclusives will not stay loyal.
Posted almost 7 years ago
2

I advise you, before removing your TS catalog, to think about the solution of Mark-Florquin. Be cunning. do not act guided by anger and frustration.

Polygonal-Miniatures wrote
Polygonal-Miniatures
Thanks for the support, Supercigale. I will post my entire response to TS later, when I get their response.
Exnihilum wrote
Exnihilum
Not worth the work, unless it's simple removal of file extras. The models pay pretty bad for the time spent already, AFAIK.
Posted almost 7 years ago
2

There is also 1 other possibility: for example to sell collections of 2 products for high price on TS and the same 2 products sell individually here on CGT for fair price.

zabotlama wrote
zabotlama
And I mean high price which is higher than buying both products individually on CGT. )))
tivsol wrote
tivsol
not so dusty! +1 )
Posted almost 7 years ago
2

There is no logic in publishing degraded products in TS. People will not buy it so what is the point? More likely It will hurt your image in buyers eyes and you will lose this potential customer. Also I would feel pretty bad if someone bought it.

Polygonal-Miniatures wrote
Polygonal-Miniatures
I believe we need to, next to reducing quality on TS, make a strong signal to buyers that we've had it with this TS exploitation. They need to know we are paid fair (or not) for the work we put in our products. Any idea on how to accomplish this?
IndieArt wrote
IndieArt
Buyers don't care about your problems with TS. If you reduce quality of your models you will send only one signal to buyers and that is that you make low quality models.
Supercigale wrote
Supercigale
the first reason has just been explained by Mark-Florquin. The second, keep visibility on Google
Posted almost 7 years ago
0

@mark-florquin, i don't think that buyers will get your signal. As i said in TS forum, by publishing crippled product, you will damage your reputation, not turbosquid's and you will punish your customers, not turbosquid.

Polygonal-Miniatures wrote
Polygonal-Miniatures
I only care about my own integrity in this matter. And there HAS to be a difference in product quality that reflects the difference in income .
LemonadeCG wrote
LemonadeCG
Of course, you are free to do as you see it best, but i don't think that such a move would benefit you or your customers. And turbosquid wouldn't even notice that, nor they would care.
Posted almost 7 years ago
1

So instead of spending time making your products worse you can just move few vertices, change color of textures, change name and tell TS that you sell different models on TS. Their automated system will not find your models anyway.

tivsol wrote
tivsol
yes, it's better than lowing the quality ... but it's also a lot of work and time... easier to say - "Thanks and Goodbye!"
Supercigale wrote
Supercigale
I don't think it's as easy as that .. I think TS's staff are analyzing the artists' catalogs here (mostly) and even elsewhere. Otherwise there would be many more SG members on TS :)
LemonadeCG wrote
LemonadeCG
That's actually good idea! Fight against TS, not against its customers.
Polygonal-Miniatures wrote
Polygonal-Miniatures
In grow even angrier when I realise TS actually pays staff to analyse all prices, adjust them. All from 60% of OUR sales.
Posted almost 7 years ago
0

And 1 have also 1 other suggestions, there is also 1 other american market 3DExport (paying 60% basic royalties which is much more fair compared to TS).
So what you can do in this situation is, that you also upload products on such other markets. So all markets with fair policies (CGT, 3DExport etc.) has bigger and bigger growth. And on this other markets you can set a little bit higher price as you want.
Sorry, I want to propagate other market here on CGT, but I think that everybody here wants the fair competition. :-)

LemonadeCG wrote
LemonadeCG
The problem with those other marketplaces, is that basically they're dead. If you're selling one or two products per year, it's not even worth an effort to publish. There are few more specialised platforms, that has good traffic, but they don't fit for everyone, so...
zabotlama wrote
zabotlama
Maybe you mean Unity asset store. ))) I must admit that other markets are almost dead but I made 1 sale in recent 3 months there (it maybe paid my time with uploading :-D). But it's also principial decision that I want to sponzor sites which I like too. But of course at this moment CGT will be number one for me.
Yehat wrote
Yehat
3dexport is a dead market. 1 sell per 2-3 month.
Posted almost 7 years ago
0

Sorry for mistakes, post editing missing here, so again:

"Sorry, I don't want to propagate other market here on CGT..."

Now my previous post gives maybe sense. )))

Posted almost 7 years ago
3

Well I don't know why I'm even discussing these workarounds. If you need TS so much you probably have to obey their slavery laws. If you don't like to be a dairy cow then leave.

Plutonius3d wrote
My thoughts exactly. They also will NOT stop at this either.
Posted almost 7 years ago
0

I am still thinking how to deal with this situation.
But I must admit that leaving TS has also 1 interesting aspect:

I personally try to do unique content (my own design concepts or real models, which are missing on market).
And till now I made my research on TS (so if some model has been already published on TS, I didn't do such a model, althoug it was missing on CGT).

But if I did models primarily for CGT, I could more focus on CGT catalogue and here is in some categories more space to do unique models. And if same model is on TS, I can compete with it with better price.

But I must say that I am not decided yet, still thinking. But this is horrible situation, instead of doing something meaningful, TS forces me already 2nd day thinking how to deal with unpleasant situation and my head is not clear. :-(

Posted almost 7 years ago
1

Look at the last posts:
https://forum.squid.io/t/turbosquid-best-price-guarantee/21039/233
Matt is closed the thread. I think, he is afraid of the consequences.

tivsol wrote
tivsol
he does not want the sellers to discuss it ...
LemonadeCG wrote
LemonadeCG
That is usual attitude at the TS forums - close discussions that they don't like, ban the users that do not obey.
Posted almost 7 years ago
4

I have never sold models in TS, I never found it a friendly place.
So, without going into the details, my impression is that TS is losing focus.
     If their main concern is CGT, it is that they are already lost, their objective should be to dominate the market without worrying about the competitors, if they are nullifying your advantage it is because you do not have something better.
     In Spanish, it's called "breathing through the wound", talking about what (secretely) hurts.

Posted almost 7 years ago
1

Hello
received a letter from the TS, I'm shocked, what should I do ?!
We already give them 60-70%, what a ***** they want from us.!?!!?!?!
Dear administrators advise us what to do, really do not want to lose customers. It's just a violation of free market rules

Yehat wrote
Yehat
Или тут цены подними, или там опустят до здешнего уровня. Тут есть хороший инструмент чтоб цены менять не заходя в редактор модели. Я поднял цены тут и установил скидку 40% для распродаж. Которые, надеюсь, будут почаще. Да, турба шантажирует нас, чтобы давить именно на ЦГтрейдер.
renovaco wrote
renovaco
Здарово- ну там спускать, просто маразм, и так грабят по полной,.Вот мне интересно с юридической точки зрения, наTS, имеют право насильно вынуждать нас изменять цены?!?! Да и к стати где тут устанавливается % на скидку, чо-то рыскаю не могу найту?!?!
happymesh wrote
happymesh
Я собираюсь пока ничего там не удалять, но товары переведу в режим оффлайн. Побудут там пока не ТС не поменяет свою политику в отношении нас, торгующих здесь на СДжТ. Подтвердить участие в промоакциях и скидках от СДжТ можно в аккаунт сеттингс, выбрав соответсвующие галочки
AtomStudios wrote
AtomStudios
Yehat, Мне кажетсиа надо боротсиа с ТС, а не просто взять и увеличиват цену на других плошадках. В следущий раз они захотят и урежут royalties. Им надо показать, что без нас, дизайнеров, они никто. Лично я всем моделиам сделаю статус оффлайн.
Posted almost 7 years ago
0

Процент скидки в Sales - Discount

Yehat wrote
Yehat
Они не заставляют нас поднимать цены здесь. Но они могут менять их там, как хотят. Это кстати тоже камень в огород турбы, ведь там же юзеры сами по идее цены ставят... А вот фигушки теперь. Другой вопрос: кто следующий на очереди после CGtrader? Может быть, 3ddd? Но ведь мы там менять цены не можем, а турба до шести баксов цены на всё не опустит.
renovaco wrote
renovaco
Михаил если удобно--го к нам в "тридеэшный" чатик ?!
Yehat wrote
Yehat
Я там с обеда про это всё изложил ужо. Вёл прямую трансляцию. Неудобно в нашем. Доценты догева и прочие флудят много, а на форуме у админов изжога от названий и новостей с других стоков. На турбе трэд закрыли, поэтому сюда вот перешёл. Всё-таки здесь вторая сторона этого конфликта
renovaco wrote
renovaco
Ок :)ясно
tivsol wrote
tivsol
а вы уверены что TS будет смотреть на изначальную цену, а не с учетом здешней (практически постоянной) скидки?
renovaco wrote
renovaco
Ну кто их знает-все возможно- по крайне мере пока ориентируются на стоковую цену
renovaco wrote
renovaco
А в реале прикиньте, сколько человеко-часов они угробили, что бы собрать инфу, просто зашквар какой то
Yehat wrote
Yehat
Хорош вопрос про скидки. Но думаю что смотреть цену будут без них. У турбы тоже бывают скидки и распродажи в последнее время. Так что тут баш на баш. Там возмутились ещё те, кто в гильдии состоит. Потому что поняли, что теряют деньги на эксклюзивной программе. Ведь те, кто продаёт в 2-3-х местах имеют больше, раз против них вот так воевать начали .
tivsol wrote
tivsol
нет дыма без огня... но мне кажется, что эксклюзивники пока живут неплохо... просто с таким отношением к художникам (воровской роялити) они позволяют развиваться конкурентам... и в последнее время стали терять покупателей.... как следствие меньше покупок у эксклюзивов... мы неэксклюзивщики своим дисбалансом цен в сторону CGT вытягиваем покупателей из TS... НО! они же сами себе яму роют!!! и продолжают рыть... жадность мэтта погубит...
Posted almost 7 years ago
2

I see people asking for some direction.

Obviously everyone needs to decide for his own what to do but my stance is that cutting down your prices on Ts would be unwise.

I had very low feelings (probably lots of you likewise?) turning over 60% of my earnings for years and now they want me to go even lower?

There use to be a time when there was no other options then to keep bending over, but that time is passed now.

Ts is making calculated business decisions, no emotion involved so don't make things to emotional for yourself. They have probably made decision they are going to re brand/differentiate and be the market for exclusive checkmate certified premium content (best guess). They previously went on making offers (via non disclosure personal mail messages) catching as much as they can in exclusive trap and moved what they don’t need to CGstudio.

You can be certain they are moving forward on cutting down as they have closed conversations on Ts forum (clearly not like how conversation is going), so loss for artists on that site is certain (its probably final move to spew out all that is not exclusive and get in last of them that fall).

If you stay then know they will only keep squeezing you until you fall for the exclusivity trap, it's not worth it because there is way more opportunity on horizon for content creators that keep ownership.

Also if you do stay and cut down then you probably risk lose some transactions here to clients that have Ts account alongside CGt account, in that case you are just handing over 60% in return for nothing.

The only thing they hope is that you fall and go exclusive and sell out, if you don’t then your finished over there anyways.

Basically it boils down to this, if you don’t plan to make premium content to all criteria that they will keep pushing trough your throat then your better here.

The other way around, if you do want to get in exclusive club and don't mind turning over in all directions then Ts probably has good value for you.

Hope this can help making you decide whats best for you.

(keep in mind these are personal opinions)

Posted almost 7 years ago
3

Be nonexclusive seller is MORE profitable, than exclusive.

Posted almost 7 years ago
12

I also got that funny email ultimatum-message from TS with .csv file attached.

I'm going make offline those models which will be touched by TS. I'll keep them for year or so offline, then if TS won't change their mind will bun them forever. I'm sure it won't impact TS in any way, but they are fed up and spoiled enough and I don't want feed and spoil them any longer.
I think CGT and other smaller marketplaces has a bright future. I hope that they are not going to be eaten by TS one day.
So, CGT, we are with you! Stay strong and encouraged!

On other hand there are a lot of places where CGT could improve.

Urecky wrote
Urecky
Yes, I agree with you.
Posted almost 7 years ago
10

All my models were removed on Turbosquid.

iterateCGI wrote
iterateCGI
Taking down 500+ models, that’s a statement, respect Plutonius 3d.
Posted almost 7 years ago
3

It's called turbosquit. It was in the title all along... :)

Yehat wrote
Yehat
Turbosquirt ))))
LemonadeCG wrote
LemonadeCG
Unfortunatelly majority will turbostay and only handfull of artist will find courage to turbosquit. TS knows that very well and they will exploit sellers to the maximum.
beckstation wrote
beckstation
I dont believe that LemonadeCG, I mean, people know when they are being messed with, and this is a business. People wont just be like yeah, whatever. I mean, sure, many will, but I do believe lots [30-40%] would either quit/consider leaving/stop uploading there.
Exnihilum wrote
Exnihilum
Don't TurboQuit without reaping your last handful of TurboQuid.
Posted almost 7 years ago
3

@Zet Good idea to set models to offline, forgot that feature was there.

Funny, I was looking trough the Ts forum and came along Matts explanation on how he not likes people are using his platform for search and then go on google to find same models elsewhere for better price.

This was exactly last thing of value Ts site had to offer for me.
The value was that clients that do not like to search elsewhere they could buy my models strait away on Ts.

Now they do need to search elsewhere if they want to find them in the first place, just have put all my models to offline.

Also this made no sense to me (quoting Matt ) ”For artists selling elsewhere, there really is a question of pricing that I don't understand. Why are you pricing based on the net you want, instead of the value to the customer? If customers think your models are worth $50, why sell them at $30 elsewhere if you have a higher royalty rate? For those complaining that they don't want prices lowered at TS, then what is the objection to raising them elsewhere and having an even higher net?“

My answer would be I ask 50 on your platform (would like it to be lower) but can not due to hefty price tag on your service.

There are less buyers willing to offer 50 and more buyers willing to offer 30.

The sellers willing to offer 50 they can get it on Ts and sellers willing to offer 30 they can get it on CGt.

I don't want the ones that are willing to give 30 to get them on Ts ok.

Exnihilum wrote
Exnihilum
"”For artists selling elsewhere, there really is a question of pricing that I don't understand." Gee, now that's a hard mathematical nut to crack. Price * 0.8 = well, it pays for something in my life. Price * 0.4 = sorry dear customer, blame TS
Posted almost 7 years ago
4

Only just taken a look over this.

As a seller that only operates here on CGT; I am very thankful for them at least being caring about their sellers and buyers.
I have never used TS for selling models, and never plan to. How arrogant of them to control prices. Its not them making the models and putting the time in, its us. So let us sell, and be grateful people use your platform.

Part of me cant actually believe that they have even sent that email...

Plutonius3d wrote
Dealing with Turbosquid in the past I wasn`t too surprised. Well maybe just a little since I think they went way too far. So far that I just took down my 500+ models and haven`t looked back. They could care less about artists.
tivsol wrote
tivsol
if the TS touches the prices on my models - I will do the same ... they took 60% of the proceeds from sales of my models (which I spent a lot of time on, and which have not yet paid off there) I think I do not want to endure it anymore )))
Plutonius3d wrote
Tivsol: Ever since they screwed their artists with the introduction of Squidguild back in 2010 I have been looking for a reason to leave. Thankfully CGtrader provides a great alternative to Turbosquid and they actually care about their artists which is a big bonus. That and Turbosquid sales have literally dropped off the face compared to 2010. Every year, lower and lower net sales. I think Turbosquid is slowly losing their market share and this latest endeavor is a act of desperation.
Posted almost 7 years ago
9

I have been pondering a while: How could CGTrader counter this move. And haha, they don't have to do anything: Automatically they will have "best price quarantee" as well. And then some :) It's as if your opponent slaps himself accross the face and hopes you feel his pain.

That said, I really appreciate the feedback and ideas posted here. My conclusion: I will not downgrade any products on TS. instead I'll remove all collections from TS. CGT is better for upselling and I would cringe at every collection sale on TS at CGT pricing. :)

Hope all turns out well, guys. Keep building :)

Posted almost 7 years ago
5

Remove/deactivate exactly only the models they are whining about. No point in trashing up your entire house in rage quit.
There are "repackaging" options, I am sure you know what I'm hinting at, it's hinging on TS not having manhours to manually investigate every possible product configuration/reconfiguration. Even though they are getting sneaky as hell.

Posted almost 7 years ago
2

Ok i didn't like TS at the first place. I uploaded only one model there, but now it's the time to delete it. Well, it's done.

Posted almost 7 years ago
3

BTW it's impossible to close your account on TS:
https://support.turbosquid.com/hc/en-us/articles/230094887-How-do-I-close-my-account-

Posted almost 7 years ago
1

With great surprise I discovered that TurboSquid has unwittingly reduced the prices on some my models.
I still demal that the website "TS" will not dare to make this shameful action...
It has been a lot of disgruntled users in recent weeks, on forum been live discussion....
But it happened. Yesterday I discovered this fact with some models on TS.

I immediately restored the justice, a difference in price, what i think is right and it is my right. Turbosquid like it or not.
At the same time, many models that were in the "free" category, price=0, have now become paid. And "free" these models are now only on CGT.

Exnihilum wrote
Exnihilum
What, without a warning!? Did they send you a confirmation on that lowering?
Posted almost 7 years ago
0

Discussion of this action on "TurboSquid" is planned Tomorrow in many communities of 3D modellers in Europe, Eastern-Europe and Asia.

What do you think of this problem? Because many modelers have sales and on TS and on CGT. Never had any problems. Although so unhealthy royalties on Turbosquid was and so unreasonable. And now here is so became...

In the meantime.. Many sites on sales 3D models-applaud standing still and rejoice in address TurboSquid.

LemonadeCG wrote
LemonadeCG
Could you give some links to these communities - i'd like to follow their discussion if not participate in it. Russian language for me is not a problem.
Posted almost 7 years ago
2

Just moved offline all products on TS

Urecky wrote
Urecky
as this, just moved?
happymesh wrote
happymesh
В продукт паблишере, в верхнем правом углу три точки зеленые, клик по ним, в выпадающем меню самая нижняя кнопка мув оффлайн, только перед этим нужно проставить галочки на товарах, то есть выбрать товары
Posted almost 7 years ago
3

@Urecky, TS demonstrated time and time again that they don't care about interests of the artists, they only care about their own interests. They see that traffic is diverging to other marketplaces, where prices for the same products are much smaller and they want to fix that problem. Problem is, that the only way they know how to fix it, is by enforcing restrictions to the artists. They would never consider to lower their commissions, unless there absolutely wouldn't be other way. Unfortunatelly they can do whatever they want, because sellers are completely uncoordinated and divided. For most of them income from selling models is only small side money and they don't care much about that, others just upload models and completely ignore everything but monthly e-mail about their revenue. Large sellers don't want to stir things up, because they're affraid to be kicked off and only few souls aren't willing to swallow that insult from TS. But they are very small portion of all community and TS aren't affraid them, because they can brake them one by one.

Urecky wrote
Urecky
If the model is made by my Studio, by me or my colleagues, it is estimated to: cost hours of work, +12% on development, + expenses, + other nuances. And if for example, the cost of the model 100$, the Studio should get its earned money, its $ 100. In this case, both sellers and buyers are satisfied. But the TS wants to capitalize on someone else's work, they earn at the expense of the buyer, the buyer has to pay 250$. So Turbosquid loves its customers? Or so strongly likes themselves the most? Let the TS get used to live according to the laws of business, the principle of normal competition works in the world and not "turning hands" and let no coming up with new rules in their favor. And in this case, the buyer pays more, the seller will get less. Happy only TS?! Or already the moment when the extension staff of TS have led to the point "Z"?!
Urecky wrote
Urecky
LemonadeCG So far we no are determined with the platforms for discussions on this topic. But while the main is CGTrader. And we will continue to attract other sites.
Exnihilum wrote
Exnihilum
So they simply lowered the prices all over the line. That leaves no other option than putting everything offline (can't be bothered to control every price), and wait until they remove the account. Well, screw them. They just buried themselves a little bit deeper.
iterateCGI wrote
iterateCGI
@lemonadeCG, its simple math, Ts will lose this, takes a bit of time but result will be clear if they don't change for the better, they are currently not cost effective and CGt is delivering better service for fraction of the cost.
Posted almost 7 years ago
0

LemonadeCG
So far we no are determined with the platforms for discussions on this topic. But while the main is CGTrader. And we will continue to attract other sites.

Posted almost 7 years ago
6

Finally they done that shit and I've just suspended all my stuff there. 40% was a real stealing, but mandatory lowering prices is unbelievable kick in my face. I suggest other good people to do the same....

Posted over 6 years ago
3

Guys, leave TS. They are doing Third degree torture.... :( I left because they deleted my content! + They are not good as CgTrader team!

Plutonius3d wrote
What are they doing now? I left last month.
TechSpark wrote
TechSpark
They were deleting my content/models slowly without no reason and the worst part is that I can't even restore them! :( Now I model it from scratch! They are not good community! also my models was high quality They don't even gave reason after my A/c. suspend! I left :(
tssrkt wrote
tssrkt
Why they deleted your content?
tssrkt wrote
tssrkt
Did you contact support of TS and ask them about deleting your models? One my model on TS was deleted too, but I re-uploaded it.
Posted over 6 years ago
0

I thought that already all calmed down and I alone continue to fight turbo-arbitrariness...
But now I see I'm not alone.
And their constant intervention in the established and accepted prices continues. On their forum to raise this issue does not work.

With Turbosquid no one wanted to swear, but they severely violate the rights of the authors of the models. Absolutely not hesitate to take away most of what the author will get. Where else is there in the world?!

But, i want to note that I do not want to leave TurboSquid.
The more of areas for sale, the better.
You need to earn. But, indispensably and importantly, defend their rights.
To leave TurboSquid this is will very simple... But does this scenario make sense?

I took such measures..
Identical models I designed in a new way, made different.
Now these are different versions of the same model.
Slightly different texture size, version 3dsmax, equipment and some other things.
The screenshots of the rendering - remains exactly the same.

And if there is now an attempt to level prices again, then it will be a fact for me to attract legal support and recover moral damage with .
That's what the law firm advised me to do, which took the case.

And another "subtle" point. There are very simple models that will on some sites set as "free", but on TS price will be set.
And if the TS tries to change their value from a certain value to zero, it will be a very scandalous situation.

tivsol wrote
tivsol
I have models that are free on CGT, at the same time on TS are paid. TS does not touch such models.
Posted over 6 years ago
1

Perfectly. I did the same thing . "Greed killed the cowboy..."
But I wonder why TSq compares prices only with CGT, CGT him that his throat became? In my Studio model even cheaper, but they do not look at it. CGT them all just in head in TS.

Posted over 6 years ago
0

One should not whine but unite massively and unsubscribe the TS about deleting models, if such letters are at least 30% of the total number of users, the TS will be forced to reconsider their attitude towards the artists. Do not forget that the constant growth of 3d models reduces the cost of work. The earlier this is done, the better the artists will be

Exnihilum wrote
Exnihilum
Constant growth of non-unique stuff reduces the cost, yes. There is no reason to put on ridiculously low prices if one has original production. It's just stupid. A studio will not be more likely to buy one's stuff just because it's cheap as dirt and less likely just because there were 400000 models 10 years ago and 2000000 models today.
Posted over 6 years ago
3

I sent all my TS models to offline... almost sure that this is what the TS was trying to achieve )

Posted over 6 years ago
0

I am new on CGTrader, I will wait some time and will see - if CGTrader will give me more revenue than TS - then I will sent my models on TS too.

tssrkt wrote
tssrkt
I mean I will send my models offline on TS too.) Sorry for my bad English.))

Your answer

In order to post an answer, you need to sign in.

Help
Chat