How did you choose license？？ No AI？

No AI for me. CGT has failed to explain how enabling AI would be profitable for artists. They only mention vague concepts of future monetization. To me, vague = scam, or at least not above board. If there are any artists that actually have made money on this, I will gladly retract my comments.

It's pretty simple, really. If you don't want that your assets might be used in AI training datasets, you choose no AI license. If your model depicts any brand or intellectual property that you don't own, or don't have rights to distribute, promote, etc., you choose editorial license. In almost all other cases, it's royalty free license.

As for me, everything that has appeared on the Internet - there is no point in putting a No Ai license - believe me, most likely your product will be used for machine learning without notifying you about it. I put a No Ai license on my products on this site only out of solidarity with the other guys, although I understand that there is 0 point in this. Last year, I made a profit on turbosquid for products that participated in machine learning (and I want to say it was not bad), but again - no decryption of which products participated in machine learning and when. They just paid me a certain amount with a decryption of the Contributor Fund Program at the end of the year. That's all - no decryption of what and when was used. You can in no way control whether your models were used in machine learning or not. I suspect that many people made a fortune on this. This is purely my personal opinion.