Introducing my latest wand set, featuring a majestic eagle-themed display base!
What's Included in the Set:
The wall-mounting bracket is not included, but you can attach one to the back of the model yourself. I recommend using a sturdy metal bracket.
The largest piece of the base is around 25-30 cm (10-12 inches), so I highly recommend printing it on a large 3D printer. For those who prefer single-piece prints, I’ve also included one-piece versions in the set.
The wand holders, golden elements, and other small details are separated into individual parts, making it easier to print and paint without masking. Each piece has connector pins included for easy assembly. The wands also come in both single-piece and multi-part versions.
Seraphina’s wand features a separate purple gemstone. I suggest printing it in clear resin or painting it with a glossy purple finish and sealing it with a shiny varnish for the best effect.
Most metallic-looking parts of the base and wands have been separated to allow for easier printing and painting. Assembly pins are included for these parts as well.
You can choose between two versions:
The longer gold details have been split into two parts for better printability. Some gold pieces also feature thin, independent decorative strips. To make printing easier, I’ve added small built-in supports to those sections (labeled Gold With Support). These supports are around 1-1.5 mm thick (0.04-0.06 inches) and can be easily removed after printing. If you prefer, you can also print the support-free versions directly.
If you have any questions, feel free to reach out! I’ve done my best to split the model into manageable parts, but for the best results, I recommend printing it on a large-format printer. If possible, go for single-piece prints using something like an Ender 5 Plus or a similar machine.
I hope you love this set and enjoy printing these wands as much as I enjoyed designing them!
3D printing settingsI haven’t printed the set myself yet, so I can’t provide exact print settings at the moment. However, I’d suggest: